As we approach yet another
presidential election, the apple cart of normalcy has been upset. The campaign
of Donald J. Trump eschews convention and forges ahead in a manner that is anathema
to the establishment of Washington D.C. Mr. Trump is in the unique position of
contesting not just the challengers from three different parties, but the
challenge from the intellectual elitists in academia and political office. The
similarities to the Jackson and Adams contests in 1824 and 1828 have been drawn
by others and are not wholly inaccurate.
In 1824 Jackson won the popular and electoral
votes but failed to secure the majority of the Electoral College. Thrown to the
House by the twelfth amendment, the establishment instituted their desires over
that of the people and put Adams into office. This splintered the Democratic -
Republican Party and the Democrat party emerged on the Jacksonian side in the
election of 1828. This Democrat Party bears little positional semblance to the
party of today. Indeed, the establishment that supported Adams was lamented in
a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Gov. William Giles of Virginia. “take together the decisions of the federal
court, the doctrines of the President [John Q. Adams], and the misconstructions
of the constitutional compact acted on by the legislature of the federal bench,
and it is but too evident, that the three ruling branches of that department
are in combination to strip their colleagues, the State authorities, of the
powers reserved by them, and to exercise themselves all functions foreign and
domestic."
The platform of today’s Democrat Party seems to have been described
verbatim in Jefferson’s letter. You would think that the Republicans are on the
other end of the beam in opposition. Yes, for the last 24 years, the
conservative elitists have proposed positions, ideas, and policy that courts
the rational thought of the electorate but has little chance of implementation.
In fact, the Republicans have been little more that the Washington Generals to
the Democrat’s Globetrotters (I borrow this perfect metaphor from a fantastic
article, The Flight 93 Election, at The Claremont Institute here)
since 1992. When the Republicans won elections in 2000 and 2004, very little of
the stated positions, ideas, and policy of the elitist intelligentsia was put
into effect. One must go back to the presidency of Ronald Reagan in the 1980’s
to see conservative principles put into action in any meaningful manner. And
they succeeded famously. One can only assume that there is no desire today to
actually implement the posits of conservative ideology but only to continue to
feast at the teats of the cash cow of a conservative electorate desperate for
change but unable to achieve it.
So how is a conservative electorate
to effect meaningful change in the political process? In our country, that is
through elections. For the last 188 years, the candidates for the major parties
were determined by party manipulators who would throw their financial support
behind the candidate of their choice in the primaries, crushing any sincere
opposition. The electorate would be forced to vote for the lessor of two evils
and inevitably the conservatives lost. Ronald Reagan was just about the lone
exception. There was a challenge in 1992 by businessman Ross Perot but he was
thwarted by the establishment big money machine. He then ran an independent campaign
out of spite that subverted any hope for the reelection of George H.W. Bush as
the Republican establishment candidate, giving us the Clinton’s dystopian
nightmare we now find foisted upon us.
Today, another businessman has come
forth with an insurgent campaign. A rebellious climate led to his victory in
the primaries to the dismay of party manipulators. Those manipulators in the
establishment of the party have now thrown a political hissy fit, swearing to
never vote for Donald J. Trump. They make wild assertions attempting to bring
him down in the hopes of their own selfish survival. They have started a
movement self-labelled #NEVERTRUMP. Ignoring the consequences of the election
of Hillary Clinton, who is the only other viable candidate, they only think of
themselves retaining or returning to power. I have always developed my views
based on my own inherent ideology, then found candidates that most clearly
mirrored those views. My views in this election most closely mirror Donald
Trump, as one of only two electable candidates remaining in the race. If that’s
the case, the #NEVERTRUMP crowd must oppose everything that he stands for to so
vehemently oppose his candidacy. So I listed my views on key issues that agree
with Mr. Trump. Below them I list the converse position that the #NEVERTRUMPers
must take in order to maintain their opposition.
Government:
The quality of life for American citizens is at its highest when personal
liberty is at its zenith. The role of government should be to protect that
liberty and remove itself from the daily interventions with its citizens.
#NEVERTRUMP:
The role of government is to restrict the liberty of its citizens and daily intervene
in the lives of its citizens
Economy: The economy works best in an environment
that makes it easier to hire, invest, grow, and produce in America. That can be
achieved through regulatory policy and tax reform.
#NEVERTRUMP:
The economy works best for politicians in an environment that makes it more
difficult to hire, invest, grow, and produce in America. That can be achieved
through overbearing regulatory policy and confiscatory tax policy status quo.
Tax
Reform: Americans are more capable of determining their own investments,
charities, and social interaction than the government is at making that
decision for them. Politicians inherently strive for self-preservation through
reelection, therefore will always make decisions on what is best for their own
interests and not their constituents. A tax code that is simple, enforceable,
and that only appropriates that which is necessary to fulfill constitutionally
defined obligations is necessary to the sustainability of the republic.
#NEVERTRUMP:
The U.S. government is more capable of determining the investments, charities,
and social interaction of its citizens than they themselves. A tax code that is
complex, arbitrary, and confiscatory is necessary to the sustainability of the
political class.
Constitution:
The constitution is a clearly articulated set of finite definitions of the
rights of our government, roles of our government, and rights of our citizens.
All articles and amendments are applicable, direct, and must be defended by the
citizens until changed by the defined process.
#NEVERTRUMP:
The constitution is broadly defined set of ideals that are open to vague
interpretation to implement liberal ideology. The articles and amendments are
only applicable when politically expeditious.
Judiciary:
The constitution is a clearly articulated set of finite definitions of the
rights of our government, roles of our government, and rights of our citizens.
The process for changing the U.S. Constitution is clearly defined in the
document and has been employed since its adoption. The judiciary serves to
enforce the constitution, not rewrite it in the manner of ideological views.
The president should only appoint judges that view this process as sacrosanct and
not view the judiciary as a second legislative branch.
Labels: #NEVERTRUMP, Hillary, Politics, Trump